Key Differences
In short — Radeon R7 260X outperforms the cheaper GeForce GT 630 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing GeForce GT 630 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Radeon R7 260X is 511 days newer than the cheaper GeForce GT 630.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 260X
- Performs up to 10% better in New World than GeForce GT 630 - 65 vs 59 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 - 2 vs 1 GB
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GT 630
- Up to 55% cheaper than Radeon R7 260X - $109.98 vs $246.31
- Up to 51% better value when playing New World than Radeon R7 260X - $1.86 vs $3.79 per FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than AMD Radeon R7 260X - 65 vs 115 Watts
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for $246.31 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13417 minutes ago
Desktop • May 15th, 2012
FPS
59
90%
Value, $/FPS
$1.86/FPS
100%
Price, $
$109.98
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $109.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13417 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Desktop • May 15th, 2012
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Pixel Fillrate
17.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
61.6 GTexel/s
100%
Desktop • May 15th, 2012
Pixel Fillrate
3.24 GPixel/s
18%
Texel Fillrate
12.96 GTexel/s
21%
AMD Radeon R7 260X | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 |
---|---|---|
Oct 8th, 2013 | Release Date | May 15th, 2012 |
Volcanic Islands | Generation | GeForce 600 |
$139 | MSRP | Not Available |
2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
1x 6-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 GB | Memory | 1 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | DDR3 |
128-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
104 GB/s | Bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s |
1100 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 810 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1625 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 900 MHz |