Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1650 outperforms the cheaper Radeon R7 240 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1650 is 2023 days newer than the cheaper Radeon R7 240.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 240
- Up to 60% cheaper than GeForce GTX 1650 - $59.95 vs $149.99
- Consumes up to 60% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 - 30 vs 75 Watts
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
- Performs up to 62% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Radeon R7 240 - 39 vs 24 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R7 240 - 4 vs 2 GB
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $59.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77950 minutes ago
Buy for $149.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77948 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Pixel Fillrate
5.6 GPixel/s
10.51051051051051%
Texel Fillrate
14 GTexel/s
15.015015015015015%
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon R7 240 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 |
---|---|---|
Oct 8th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Volcanic Islands | Generation | GeForce 16 |
$69 | MSRP | $149 |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
128-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
73.6 GB/s | Bandwidth | 128.1 GB/s |
650 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1485 MHz |
700 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1665 MHz |
1150 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2001 MHz |