Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1650 outperforms the cheaper Radeon R5 240 OEM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1650 is 1999 days newer than the cheaper Radeon R5 240 OEM.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM
- Up to 63% cheaper than GeForce GTX 1650 - $54.99 vs $149.99
- Consumes up to 33% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 - 50 vs 75 Watts
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
- Performs up to 19% better in Dota 2 than Radeon R5 240 OEM - 166 vs 140 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM - 4 vs 2 GB
Dota 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Buy for $54.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75204 minutes ago
Buy for $149.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75203 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Desktop • Nov 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Nov 1st, 2013
Pixel Fillrate
6.24 GPixel/s
11.711711711711711%
Texel Fillrate
18.72 GTexel/s
20.077220077220076%
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 |
---|---|---|
Nov 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Volcanic Islands | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Not Available | MSRP | $149 |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
DDR3 | Type | GDDR5 |
64-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
14.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 128.1 GB/s |
730 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1485 MHz |
780 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1665 MHz |
900 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2001 MHz |