Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 290 outperforms the cheaper Radeon Pro WX 3100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Radeon Pro WX 3100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Radeon R9 290 is 1315 days older than the cheaper Radeon Pro WX 3100.
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100
- Up to 30% cheaper than Radeon R9 290 - $139.96 vs $199.99
- Up to 3% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Radeon R9 290 - $2.98 vs $3.08 per FPS
- Consumes up to 76% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 290 - 65 vs 275 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 290
- Performs up to 38% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Radeon Pro WX 3100 - 65 vs 47 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jun 12th, 2017
FPS
47
72%
Value, $/FPS
$2.98/FPS
100%
Price, $
$139.96
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $139.96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 66 minutes ago
Buy for $199.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 66 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jun 12th, 2017
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2013
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jun 12th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
19.5 GPixel/s
32%
Texel Fillrate
39.01 GTexel/s
25%
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2013
Pixel Fillrate
60.61 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
151.5 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 290 |
---|---|---|
Jun 12th, 2017 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2013 |
Radeon Pro | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
$199 | MSRP | $399 |
1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
128-bit | Bus | 512-bit |
96 GB/s | Bandwidth | 320 GB/s |
925 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 947 MHz |
1219 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1250 MHz |