Key Differences
In short — GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB outperforms the cheaper Radeon Pro WX 2100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB is 2174 days newer than the cheaper Radeon Pro WX 2100.
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100
- Up to 83% cheaper than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB - $74.99 vs $449.99
- Consumes up to 79% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB - 35 vs 165 Watts
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
- Performs up to 57% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Radeon Pro WX 2100 - 91 vs 58 FPS
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 - 16 vs 2 GB
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $74.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74784 minutes ago
Buy for $449.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74782 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
Desktop • May 18th, 2023
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
19.5 GPixel/s
16.02300739523418%
Texel Fillrate
39.01 GTexel/s
11.313805104408353%
Desktop • May 18th, 2023
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB |
---|---|---|
Jun 4th, 2017 | Release Date | May 18th, 2023 |
Radeon Pro | Generation | GeForce 40 |
$149 | MSRP | $499 |
1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 16-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 GB | Memory | 16 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR6 |
64-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
48 GB/s | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
925 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 2310 MHz |
1219 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 2535 MHz |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2250 MHz |