Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q outperforms Radeon Pro WX 2100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q is 1046 days newer than Radeon Pro WX 2100.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
- Performs up to 40% better in Sons Of The Forest than Radeon Pro WX 2100 - 35 vs 25 FPS
- Consumes up to 14% less energy than AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 - 30 vs 35 Watts
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 - 4 vs 2 GB
Sons Of The Forest
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
FPS
25
71%
Value, $/FPS
$3.2/FPS
100%
Price, $
$79.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $79.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 162 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
Mobile • Apr 15th, 2020
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
19.5 GPixel/s
54%
Texel Fillrate
39.01 GTexel/s
54%
Mobile • Apr 15th, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
36 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
72 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q |
---|---|---|
Jun 4th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 15th, 2020 |
Radeon Pro | Generation | GeForce 16 Mobile |
$149 | MSRP | Not Available |
1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort | Outputs | None |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
2 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR6 |
64-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
48 GB/s | Bandwidth | 160 GB/s |
925 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 930 MHz |
1219 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1125 MHz |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1250 MHz |