Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB outperforms the cheaper Radeon Pro WX 2100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Radeon Pro WX 2100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB is 290 days older than the cheaper Radeon Pro WX 2100.
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100
- Up to 48% cheaper than GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB - $74.99 vs $144.99
- Up to 40% better value when playing Rust than GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB - $0.87 vs $1.45 per FPS
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB - 35 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB
- Performs up to 16% better in Rust than Radeon Pro WX 2100 - 100 vs 86 FPS
- Up to 50% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 - 3 vs 2 GB
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
FPS
86
86%
Value, $/FPS
$0.87/FPS
100%
Price, $
$74.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $74.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 150 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 18th, 2016
FPS
100
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.45/FPS
60%
Price, $
$144.99
51%
FPS Winner
Buy for $144.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 150 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
Desktop • Aug 18th, 2016
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
19.5 GPixel/s
23%
Texel Fillrate
39.01 GTexel/s
31%
Desktop • Aug 18th, 2016
Pixel Fillrate
81.98 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
123 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB |
---|---|---|
Jun 4th, 2017 | Release Date | Aug 18th, 2016 |
Radeon Pro | Generation | GeForce 10 |
$149 | MSRP | $199 |
1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 GB | Memory | 3 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
64-bit | Bus | 192-bit |
48 GB/s | Bandwidth | 192.2 GB/s |
925 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1506 MHz |
1219 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1708 MHz |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2002 MHz |