Key Differences
In short — Radeon Pro 5300M outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon Pro 5300M is 204 days newer than GeForce GTX 1650.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
- Consumes up to 12% less energy than AMD Radeon Pro 5300M - 75 vs 85 Watts
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
173
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.9/FPS
100%
Price, $
$154.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $154.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4980 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Mobile • Nov 13th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
93%
AMD Radeon Pro 5300M | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 |
---|---|---|
Nov 13th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Radeon Pro Mac | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Not Available | MSRP | $149 |
None | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR5 |
128-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
192 GB/s | Bandwidth | 128.1 GB/s |
1000 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1485 MHz |
1250 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1665 MHz |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2001 MHz |