In Battlefield 6, the Xeon W3670 is quite a bit slower than the Core i3-12100F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon W3670
No clear advantages
Core i3-12100F
- Up to 59% faster in Battlefield 6 – 97 vs 61 FPS
- Up to 59% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 11 years and 4 months newer – Jan 27, 2022 vs Aug 29, 2010
- Is 11 years and 4 months newer
- Consumes up to 55% less energy – 58 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 55% less energy
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Xeon W3670 vs Core i3-12100F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i3-12100F
Jan 27th, 2022
Average FPS
97 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
73 FPS
100%
Price, $
$94.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.97/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon W3670 vs Core i3-12100F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon W3670 vs Core i3-12100F in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon W3670
Aug 29th, 2010
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
3.466 GHz
81%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i3-12100F
Jan 27th, 2022
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon W3670 Aug 29th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-12100F Jan 27th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Aug 29th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 27th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | $97.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1366 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 130W | Power Consumption | 58W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
