Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms Xeon W3520 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 5028 days newer than Xeon W3520.
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 3% better in Control than Xeon W3520 - 205 vs 199 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon W3520 - 16 vs 8 threads
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
205
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.77/FPS
100%
Price, €
€157
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €157 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 191 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Mar 30th, 2009
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon W3520 | vs | Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Mar 30th, 2009 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i5 |
Bloomfield | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
130 W | TDP | Not Available |
45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |