Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms Xeon w3-2435 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 42 days older than Xeon w3-2435.
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 19% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Xeon w3-2435 - 135 vs 113 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon w3-2435 - 32 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon w3-2435 doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
135
100%
Value, €/FPS
€5.33/FPS
100%
Price, €
€719.98
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €719.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 64 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Feb 15th, 2023
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon w3-2435 | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Feb 15th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Xeon W | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Sapphire Rapids | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 4677 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 16 |
16 | Threads | 32 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 120 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |