Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700K outperforms Xeon Silver 4116 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-13700K is 1904 days newer than Xeon Silver 4116.
Advantages of Xeon Silver 4116
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-13700K - 85 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i7-13700K
- Performs up to 13% better in Forza Horizon 5 than Xeon Silver 4116 - 186 vs 165 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon Silver 4116 doesn't have integrated graphics
Forza Horizon 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
186
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.97/FPS
100%
Price, €
€365.83
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €365.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 56 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Server/Workstation • Jul 11th, 2017
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon Silver 4116 | vs | Core i7-13700K |
---|---|---|
Jul 11th, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Xeon Silver | Collection | Core i7 |
Skylake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 3647 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 16 |
24 | Threads | 24 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
85 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |