Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700K outperforms Xeon E5620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-13700K is 4578 days newer than Xeon E5620.
Advantages of Xeon E5620
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Core i7-13700K - 80 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i7-13700K
- Performs up to 52% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Xeon E5620 - 270 vs 178 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5620 - 24 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5620 doesn't have integrated graphics
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
270
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.48/FPS
100%
Price, €
€399
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €399 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7569 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5620 | vs | Core i7-13700K |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i7 |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |