Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700K outperforms Xeon E5520 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-13700K is 4929 days newer than Xeon E5520.
Advantages of Xeon E5520
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Core i7-13700K - 80 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i7-13700K
- Performs up to 42% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Xeon E5520 - 211 vs 149 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5520 - 24 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5520 doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
211
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.73/FPS
100%
Price, €
€365.83
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €365.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 224 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 30th, 2009
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5520 | vs | Core i7-13700K |
---|---|---|
Mar 30th, 2009 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i7 |
Gainestown | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 125 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
17.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |