Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900KS outperforms Xeon E5-2699A v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900KS is 1098 days newer than Xeon E5-2699A v4.
Advantages of Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-9900KS - 44 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Core i9-9900KS
- Performs up to 5% better in DOOM Eternal than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 504 vs 479 FPS
- Consumes up to 12% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 127 vs 145 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
DOOM Eternal
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Xeon E5-2699A v4
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Core i9-9900KS
Desktop • Oct 28th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2699A v4 | vs | Core i9-9900KS |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 25th, 2016 | Release Date | Oct 28th, 2019 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Broadwell | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
22 | Cores | 8 |
44 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
| 145 W | TDP | 127 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD 630 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
