Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 8700G outperforms Xeon E5-2698 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 8700G is 3409 days newer than Xeon E5-2698 v3.
Advantages of Xeon E5-2698 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 8700G - 32 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Ryzen 7 8700G
- Performs up to 8% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Xeon E5-2698 v3 - 232 vs 214 FPS
- Consumes up to 52% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2698 v3 - 65 vs 135 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2698 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
232
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.3/FPS
100%
Price, €
€302.57
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €302.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7610 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2698 v3 | vs | Ryzen 7 8700G |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Haswell | Codename | Not Available |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 16 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
135 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 4 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 780M |
No | Overclockable | Yes |