In Battlefield 6, the Xeon E5-2690 is quite a bit slower than the Ryzen 7 3700X. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $139 cheaper!
Xeon E5-2690
- Up to 70% cheaper – $58.90 vs $198.00
- Up to 70% cheaper
- Up to 58% better value in Battlefield 6 – $0.96 vs $2.30/FPS
- Up to 58% better value in Battlefield 6
Ryzen 7 3700X
- Up to 41% faster in Battlefield 6 – 86 vs 61 FPS
- Up to 41% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 7 years and 4 months newer – Jul 07, 2019 vs Mar 06, 2012
- Is 7 years and 4 months newer
- Consumes up to 52% less energy – 65 vs 135 Watts
- Consumes up to 52% less energy
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-2690 vs Ryzen 7 3700X: Comparison of performance and price
Xeon E5-2690
Mar 6th, 2012
Average FPS
61 FPS
71%
Min 1% FPS
46 FPS
71%
Price, $
$58.9
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.96/FPS
100%
Ryzen 7 3700X
Jul 7th, 2019
Average FPS
86 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
65 FPS
100%
Price, $
$198
29%
Value, $/FPS
$2.3/FPS
42%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-2690 vs Ryzen 7 3700X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-2690 vs Ryzen 7 3700X in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-2690
Mar 6th, 2012
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
62%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
81%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
86%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 7 3700X
Jul 7th, 2019
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-2690 Mar 6th, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 7 3700X Jul 7th, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Released | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| – | MSRP | $329.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011 | Socket | AM4 |
| 135 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
