Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900K outperforms Xeon E5-2670 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900K is 3698 days newer than Xeon E5-2670 v2.
Advantages of Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 27% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Xeon E5-2670 v2 - 197 vs 155 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2670 v2 - 32 vs 20 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2670 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
197
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.39/FPS
100%
Price, €
€471.07
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €471.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 223 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2670 v2 | vs | Core i9-14900K |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 24 |
20 | Threads | 32 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
115 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |