Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5950X outperforms Xeon E5-2620 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 5950X is 2250 days newer than Xeon E5-2620 v3.
Advantages of Xeon E5-2620 v3
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 5950X - 85 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 5950X
- Performs up to 418% better in Cities: Skylines II than Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 57 vs 11 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 32 vs 12 threads
Cities: Skylines II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
57
100%
Value, €/FPS
€5.51/FPS
100%
Price, €
€314
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €314 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8840 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2620 v3 | vs | Ryzen 9 5950X |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Haswell-E | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 16 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
85 W | TDP | 105 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |