Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 8700G outperforms Xeon E5-2620 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 8700G is 3781 days newer than Xeon E5-2620 v2.
Advantages of Ryzen 7 8700G
- Performs up to 84% better in Starfield than Xeon E5-2620 v2 - 79 vs 43 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 - 65 vs 80 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 - 16 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
79
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.85/FPS
100%
Price, €
€303.77
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €303.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2620 v2 | vs | Ryzen 7 8700G |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Not Available |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
2.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 4 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 780M |
No | Overclockable | Yes |