Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KF outperforms Xeon E5-2609 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900KF is 2614 days newer than Xeon E5-2609 v3.
Advantages of Xeon E5-2609 v3
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900KF - 85 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i9-12900KF
- Performs up to 19% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Xeon E5-2609 v3 - 186 vs 156 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 - 24 vs 6 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
186
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.88/FPS
100%
Price, €
€350.2
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €350.2 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 266 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2609 v3 | vs | Core i9-12900KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell-E/EP, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 16 |
6 | Threads | 24 |
1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
85 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |