In Battlefield 6, the Xeon E5-1660 v4 is quite a bit slower than the Ryzen 9 7950X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5-1660 v4
- Consumes up to 18% less energy – 140 vs 170 Watts
- Consumes up to 18% less energy
Ryzen 9 7950X
- Up to 77% faster in Battlefield 6 – 129 vs 73 FPS
- Up to 77% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 6 years and 3 months newer – Sep 27, 2022 vs Jun 20, 2016
- Is 6 years and 3 months newer
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-1660 v4 vs Ryzen 9 7950X: Comparison of performance and price
Xeon E5-1660 v4
Jun 20th, 2016
Average FPS
73 FPS
57%
Min 1% FPS
55 FPS
57%
Price, $
$352.36
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.82/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-1660 v4 vs Ryzen 9 7950X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-1660 v4 vs Ryzen 9 7950X in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-1660 v4
Jun 20th, 2016
Cores
8-core
50%
L3 Cache
20 MB
31%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
71%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
67%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
46%
Ryzen 9 7950X
Sep 27th, 2022
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
64 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-1660 v4 Jun 20th, 2016 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 9 7950X Sep 27th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 20th, 2016 | Released | Sep 27th, 2022 |
| $1,113.00 | MSRP | $699.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011-3 | Socket | AM5 |
140 W | Power Consumption | 170 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 5200 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | Radeon Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
