The Xeon E5-1620 v4 is a much slower gaming CPU than the Core i7-9700KF. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Xeon E5-1620 v4
The Core i7-9700KF is better in every way
Advantages of the Core i7-9700KF
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 95 vs 140 Watts
Xeon E5-1620 v4 vs Core i7-9700KF for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Xeon E5-1620 v4
Jun 20th, 2016
Average FPS
180
94%
Min 1% FPS
120
94%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i7-9700KF
Jan 8th, 2019
Average FPS
192
100%
Min 1% FPS
127
100%
Price, €
€370.34
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.92/FPS
100%
Xeon E5-1620 v4 vs Core i7-9700KF in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-1620 v4 vs Core i7-9700KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-1620 v4 vs Core i7-9700KF in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-1620 v4
Jun 20th, 2016
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
10 MB
83%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
78%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
90%
Core i7-9700KF
Jan 8th, 2019
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Xeon E5-1620 v4 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i7-9700KF |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
$294.00 | MSRP | $374.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
| Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| 140 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Performance | ||
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.5 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.6 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.9 GHz |
| 10 MB | L3 Cache | 12 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 2400 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 2666 MHz |
| No | Integrated Graphics | No |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
