Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 8700G outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 8700G is 3772 days newer than Xeon E5-1620 v2.
Advantages of Ryzen 7 8700G
- Performs up to 26% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Xeon E5-1620 v2 - 216 vs 171 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
216
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.4/FPS
100%
Price, €
€302.57
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €302.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7203 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Server/Workstation • Sep 10th, 2013
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-1620 v2 | vs | Ryzen 7 8700G |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Not Available |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 4 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 780M |
No | Overclockable | Yes |