Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700F outperforms Xeon E3-1575M v5 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-14700F is 2906 days newer than Xeon E3-1575M v5.
Advantages of Xeon E3-1575M v5
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-14700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i7-14700F
- Performs up to 17% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Xeon E3-1575M v5 - 217 vs 186 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1575M v5 - 28 vs 8 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
217
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.74/FPS
100%
Price, €
€378.37
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €378.37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 289 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Server/Workstation • Jan 24th, 2016
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E3-1575M v5 | vs | Core i7-14700F |
---|---|---|
Jan 24th, 2016 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Skylake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 20 |
8 | Threads | 28 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
45 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
Iris Pro Graphics P580 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |