Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5900X outperforms Xeon E3-1290 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 5900X is 3097 days newer than Xeon E3-1290 v2.
Advantages of Xeon E3-1290 v2
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 5900X - 87 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 5900X
- Performs up to 19% better in Battlefield 2042 than Xeon E3-1290 v2 - 176 vs 148 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1290 v2 - 24 vs 8 threads
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
176
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.38/FPS
100%
Price, €
€242.21
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €242.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 299 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E3-1290 v2 | vs | Ryzen 9 5900X |
---|---|---|
May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
87 W | TDP | 105 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |