In Battlefield 6, the Xeon E3-1275 v3 is slower than the Ryzen 7 3700X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E3-1275 v3
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Ryzen 7 3700X
- Up to 19% faster in Battlefield 6 – 86 vs 72 FPS
- Up to 19% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 6 years and 1 month newer – Jul 07, 2019 vs Jun 02, 2013
- Is 6 years and 1 month newer
- Consumes up to 23% less energy – 65 vs 84 Watts
- Consumes up to 23% less energy
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Xeon E3-1275 v3 vs Ryzen 7 3700X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen 7 3700X
Jul 7th, 2019
Average FPS
86 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
64 FPS
100%
Price, $
$269
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.12/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E3-1275 v3 vs Ryzen 7 3700X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E3-1275 v3 vs Ryzen 7 3700X in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E3-1275 v3
Jun 2nd, 2013
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
8 MB
25%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
89%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 7 3700X
Jul 7th, 2019
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E3-1275 v3 Jun 2nd, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 7 3700X Jul 7th, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| – | MSRP | $329.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | AM4 |
| 84W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3, DDR4 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD P4600 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
