Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600K outperforms Xeon E3-1270 v5 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13600K is 2535 days newer than Xeon E3-1270 v5.
Advantages of Xeon E3-1270 v5
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600K - 80 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i5-13600K
- Performs up to 9% better in Forza Horizon 4 than Xeon E3-1270 v5 - 337 vs 309 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 - 20 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 doesn't have integrated graphics
Forza Horizon 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
337
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.66/FPS
100%
Price, €
€222.6
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €222.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1692 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Server/Workstation • Oct 19th, 2015
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E3-1270 v5 | vs | Core i5-13600K |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 14 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |