Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3700X outperforms Xeon E3-1240 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 3700X is 2610 days newer than Xeon E3-1240 v2.
Advantages of Ryzen 7 3700X
- Performs up to 19% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Xeon E3-1240 v2 - 133 vs 112 FPS
- Consumes up to 6% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1240 v2 - 65 vs 69 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1240 v2 - 16 vs 8 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
133
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.06/FPS
100%
Price, €
€140.78
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €140.78 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7772 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E3-1240 v2 | vs | Ryzen 7 3700X |
---|---|---|
May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
69 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |