Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600 outperforms Xeon E3-1226 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600 is 1883 days newer than Xeon E3-1226 v3.
Advantages of Xeon E3-1226 v3
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 5 3600
- Performs up to 3% better in Fortnite than Xeon E3-1226 v3 - 229 vs 222 FPS
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1226 v3 - 65 vs 84 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1226 v3 - 12 vs 4 threads
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
229
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.37/FPS
100%
Price, €
€85
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 267 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • May 11th, 2014
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E3-1226 v3 | vs | Ryzen 5 3600 |
---|---|---|
May 11th, 2014 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Haswell, Haswell-WS | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
84 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD P4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |