Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12600K outperforms Xeon E-2378 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-12600K is 57 days newer than Xeon E-2378.
Advantages of Xeon E-2378
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-12600K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i5-12600K
- Performs up to 8% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon E-2378 - 152 vs 141 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E-2378 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Xeon E-2378
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2021
Core i5-12600K
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E-2378 | vs | Core i5-12600K |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2021 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
| Xeon E | Collection | Core i5 |
| Rocket Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 10 |
| 16 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
