Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX outperforms Core i3-12100F on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX is 42 days newer than Core i3-12100F.
Advantages of Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
- Performs up to 8% better in League of Legends than Core i3-12100F - 292 vs 271 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-12100F - 64 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Core i3-12100F
- Consumes up to 79% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX - 58 vs 280 Watts
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Mar 8th, 2022
FPS
292
100%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
FPS Winner
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
271
93%
Value, €/FPS
€0.32/FPS
100%
Price, €
€87.9
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €87.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7347 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Mar 8th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Mar 8th, 2022
Single-Core
2038
92%
Multi-Core
16424
100%
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX | vs | Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
Mar 8th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i3 |
Chagall | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 4 |
64 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
280 W | TDP | 58 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |