Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X outperforms Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X is 805 days newer than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX.
Advantages of Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X - 64 vs 32 threads
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X
- Performs up to 35% better in Starfield than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - 84 vs 62 FPS
- Consumes up to 39% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - 170 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
84
100%
Value, €/FPS
€6.19/FPS
100%
Price, €
€520
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €520 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 135 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X |
---|---|---|
Jul 14th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Castle Peak | Codename | Raphael |
AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 16 |
64 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
280 W | TDP | 170 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 45.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |