Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3960X outperforms Xeon E5-2699A v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is 1126 days newer than Xeon E5-2699A v4.
Advantages of Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
- Performs up to 7% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 193 vs 181 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 48 vs 44 threads
Advantages of Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - 145 vs 280 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Xeon E5-2699A v4
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X | vs | Xeon E5-2699A v4 |
|---|---|---|
Nov 25th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 25th, 2016 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Castle Peak | Codename | Broadwell |
| AMD Socket TRX4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 22 |
48 | Threads | 44 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 280 W | TDP | 145 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
