Ryzen Embedded V1756B vs Core i9-12900K in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
The Ryzen Embedded V1756B is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i9-12900K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Ryzen Embedded V1756B
- Consumes up to 64% less energy – 45 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of the Core i9-12900K
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 24 vs 8 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 FPS Calculator
The CPU's performance with selected game settings
Ryzen Embedded V1756B
Feb 21st, 2018
Average FPS
193
83%
Min 1% FPS
133
84%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i9-12900K
Nov 4th, 2021
Average FPS
232
100%
Min 1% FPS
158
100%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen Embedded V1756B vs Core i9-12900K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen Embedded V1756B vs Core i9-12900K in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen Embedded V1756B
Feb 21st, 2018
Cores
4-core
25%
L3 Cache
2 MB
7%
Base Frequency
3.25 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
69%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-12900K
Nov 4th, 2021
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
98%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Ryzen Embedded V1756B | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-12900K |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Feb 21st, 2018 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $599.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
45 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 4800 MHz |
| Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
