Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X outperforms the cheaper Core i9-10900KF on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-10900KF is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X is 880 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-10900KF.
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X
- Performs up to 12% better in Battlefield 2042 than Core i9-10900KF - 190 vs 169 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 32 vs 20 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i9-10900KF
- Up to 15% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X - €443.47 vs €520.00
- Up to 4% better value when playing Battlefield 2042 than Ryzen 9 7950X - €2.62 vs €2.74 per FPS
- Consumes up to 26% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X - 125 vs 170 Watts
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €520 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 436 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
169
89%
Value, €/FPS
€2.62/FPS
100%
Price, €
€443.47
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €443.47 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 436 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 9 7950X | vs | Core i9-10900KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raphael | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 10 |
32 | Threads | 20 |
4.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
5.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
170 W | TDP | 125 W |
5 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
45.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Radeon Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |