The Ryzen 9 5950X is at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the Core i3-9100F, however, it's a much worse value for money, as it's €201.01 more expensive!
Advantages of the Ryzen 9 5950X
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of the Core i3-9100F
- Up to 61% cheaper – €128.99 vs €330.00
- A better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 38% less energy – 65 vs 105 Watts
Ryzen 9 5950X vs Core i3-9100F for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Ryzen 9 5950X
Nov 5th, 2020
Average FPS
203
100%
Min 1% FPS
134
100%
Price, €
€330
39%
Value, €/FPS
€1.62/FPS
43%
Core i3-9100F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
186
92%
Min 1% FPS
123
92%
Price, €
€128.99
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.69/FPS
100%
Ryzen 9 5950X vs Core i3-9100F in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen 9 5950X vs Core i3-9100F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen 9 5950X vs Core i3-9100F in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen 9 5950X
Nov 5th, 2020
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
64 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
94%
Turbo Frequency
4.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Core i3-9100F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
4-core
25%
L3 Cache
6 MB
9%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
86%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
75%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Ryzen 9 5950X | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i3-9100F |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Nov 5th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
$799.00 | MSRP | $122.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Vermeer | Codename | Coffee Lake |
105 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
Performance | ||
16 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.6 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.2 GHz |
64 MB | L3 Cache | 6 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR4 @ 3200 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 2400 MHz |
No | Integrated Graphics | No |
Yes | Overclockable | No |