In Battlefield 6, the Ryzen 9 5900X is much faster than the Xeon E5-2699A v4 and it's also a much better value for money, as it's $810 cheaper!
Ryzen 9 5900X
- Up to 65% faster in Battlefield 6 – 104 vs 63 FPS
- Up to 65% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 4 years and 11 days newer – Nov 05, 2020 vs Oct 25, 2016
- Is 4 years and 11 days newer
- Up to 75% cheaper – $269.00 vs $1078.93
- Up to 75% cheaper
- Up to 85% better value in Battlefield 6 – $2.58 vs $17.12/FPS
- Up to 85% better value in Battlefield 6
- Consumes up to 28% less energy – 105 vs 145 Watts
- Consumes up to 28% less energy
Xeon E5-2699A v4
No clear advantages
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Ryzen 9 5900X vs Xeon E5-2699A v4: Comparison of performance and price
Ryzen 9 5900X
Nov 5th, 2020
Average FPS
104 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
78 FPS
100%
Price, $
$269
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.58/FPS
100%
Xeon E5-2699A v4
Oct 25th, 2016
Average FPS
63 FPS
61%
Min 1% FPS
47 FPS
60%
Price, $
$1078.93
24%
Value, $/FPS
$17.12/FPS
15%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen 9 5900X vs Xeon E5-2699A v4 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen 9 5900X vs Xeon E5-2699A v4 in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen 9 5900X
Nov 5th, 2020
Cores
12-core
55%
L3 Cache
64 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Xeon E5-2699A v4
Oct 25th, 2016
Cores
22-core
100%
L3 Cache
55 MB
86%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
65%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
75%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
75%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Ryzen 9 5900X Nov 5th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5-2699A v4 Oct 25th, 2016 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Nov 5th, 2020 | Released | Oct 25th, 2016 |
$549.00 | MSRP | $4,938.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM4 | Socket | LGA2011-3 |
105 W | Power Consumption | 145 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2400 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
