In Battlefield 6, the Ryzen 9 4900H is slightly faster than the Ryzen Threadripper 2920X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Ryzen 9 4900H
- Up to 8% faster in Battlefield 6 – 83 vs 77 FPS
- Up to 8% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 1 year and 5 months newer – Mar 16, 2020 vs Oct 03, 2018
- Is 1 year and 5 months newer
- Consumes up to 70% less energy – 54 vs 180 Watts
- Consumes up to 70% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
No clear advantages
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Ryzen 9 4900H vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
Oct 3rd, 2018
Average FPS
77 FPS
93%
Min 1% FPS
58 FPS
94%
Price, $
$229.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.98/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen 9 4900H vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen 9 4900H vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen 9 4900H
Mar 16th, 2020
Cores
8-core
67%
L3 Cache
8 MB
25%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
94%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. LPDDR4 RAM Speed
4266 MHz
100%
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
Oct 3rd, 2018
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
98%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
69%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Ryzen 9 4900H Mar 16th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen Threadripper 2920X Oct 3rd, 2018 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 16th, 2020 | Released | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
| – | MSRP | $649.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| FP6 | Socket | SP3r2 |
54 W | Power Consumption | 180 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4266 MHz (LPDDR4) | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
Radeon Graphics 512SP | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
