Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms Ryzen 9 3900XT on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 911 days newer than Ryzen 9 3900XT.
Advantages of Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Consumes up to 12% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D - 105 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 33% better in Starfield than Ryzen 9 3900XT - 84 vs 63 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT - 32 vs 24 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
84
100%
Value, €/FPS
€9.28/FPS
100%
Price, €
€779.26
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €779.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 50 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 9 3900XT | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Matisse | Codename | Raphael |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 16 |
24 | Threads | 32 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
105 W | TDP | 120 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |