In Battlefield 6, the Ryzen 9 3900X is quite a bit slower than the Core i9-13900F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Ryzen 9 3900X
No clear advantages
Core i9-13900F
- Up to 46% faster in Battlefield 6 – 127 vs 87 FPS
- Up to 46% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 3 years and 5 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Jul 07, 2019
- Is 3 years and 5 months newer
- Consumes up to 38% less energy – 65 vs 105 Watts
- Consumes up to 38% less energy
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Ryzen 9 3900X vs Core i9-13900F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i9-13900F
Jan 4th, 2023
Average FPS
127 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
95 FPS
100%
Price, $
$529.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.17/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen 9 3900X vs Core i9-13900F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen 9 3900X vs Core i9-13900F in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen 9 3900X
Jul 7th, 2019
Cores
12-core
50%
L3 Cache
64 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
82%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
57%
Core i9-13900F
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
56%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
53%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Ryzen 9 3900X Jul 7th, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-13900F Jan 4th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jul 7th, 2019 | Released | Jan 4th, 2023 |
$499.00 | MSRP | $524.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM4 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 105 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
