In Battlefield 6, the Ryzen 7 3700X is quite a bit slower than the Core i9-13900F. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $332 cheaper!
Ryzen 7 3700X
- Up to 63% cheaper – $198.00 vs $529.95
- Up to 63% cheaper
- Up to 45% better value in Battlefield 6 – $2.30 vs $4.17/FPS
- Up to 45% better value in Battlefield 6
Core i9-13900F
- Up to 48% faster in Battlefield 6 – 127 vs 86 FPS
- Up to 48% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 3 years and 5 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Jul 07, 2019
- Is 3 years and 5 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Ryzen 7 3700X vs Core i9-13900F: Comparison of performance and price
Ryzen 7 3700X
Jul 7th, 2019
Average FPS
86 FPS
68%
Min 1% FPS
65 FPS
68%
Price, $
$198
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.3/FPS
100%
Core i9-13900F
Jan 4th, 2023
Average FPS
127 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
95 FPS
100%
Price, $
$529.95
37%
Value, $/FPS
$4.17/FPS
55%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen 7 3700X vs Core i9-13900F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen 7 3700X vs Core i9-13900F in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen 7 3700X
Jul 7th, 2019
Cores
8-core
33%
L3 Cache
32 MB
89%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
79%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
57%
Core i9-13900F
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
56%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Ryzen 7 3700X Jul 7th, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-13900F Jan 4th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jul 7th, 2019 | Released | Jan 4th, 2023 |
$329.00 | MSRP | $524.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM4 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
