The Ryzen 7 2700X is a much slower gaming CPU than the Core i9-10920X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Ryzen 7 2700X
- Consumes up to 36% less energy – 105 vs 165 Watts
Advantages of the Core i9-10920X
- A much faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 24 vs 16 threads
Ryzen 7 2700X vs Core i9-10920X for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Ryzen 7 2700X
Apr 19th, 2018
Average FPS
183
95%
Min 1% FPS
121
95%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i9-10920X
Oct 19th, 2019
Average FPS
192
100%
Min 1% FPS
127
100%
Price, €
€1083.71
100%
Value, €/FPS
€5.64/FPS
100%
Ryzen 7 2700X vs Core i9-10920X in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen 7 2700X vs Core i9-10920X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen 7 2700X vs Core i9-10920X in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen 7 2700X
Apr 19th, 2018
Cores
8-core
67%
L3 Cache
16 MB
83%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
93%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Core i9-10920X
Oct 19th, 2019
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
19.25 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
95%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Ryzen 7 2700X | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i9-10920X |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
| $329.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
| Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Cascade Lake |
105 W | Power Consumption | 165 W |
| Performance | ||
| 8 | Cores | 12 |
| 16 | Threads | 24 |
3.7 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.5 GHz |
| 4.3 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.6 GHz |
| 16 MB | L3 Cache | 19.25 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 2933 MHz | RAM | DDR4 |
| No | Integrated Graphics | No |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
