In Battlefield 6, the Ryzen 7 1700X is slower than the Core i7-10700F. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $134 cheaper!
Ryzen 7 1700X
- Up to 41% cheaper – $195.99 vs $329.95
- Up to 41% cheaper
- Up to 29% better value in Battlefield 6 – $2.76 vs $3.88/FPS
- Up to 29% better value in Battlefield 6
Core i7-10700F
- Up to 20% faster in Battlefield 6 – 85 vs 71 FPS
- Up to 20% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 3 years and 1 month newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Mar 02, 2017
- Is 3 years and 1 month newer
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 65 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 32% less energy
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Ryzen 7 1700X vs Core i7-10700F: Comparison of performance and price
Ryzen 7 1700X
Mar 2nd, 2017
Average FPS
71 FPS
84%
Min 1% FPS
53 FPS
84%
Price, $
$195.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.76/FPS
100%
Core i7-10700F
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
85 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
63 FPS
100%
Price, $
$329.95
59%
Value, $/FPS
$3.88/FPS
71%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen 7 1700X vs Core i7-10700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen 7 1700X vs Core i7-10700F in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen 7 1700X
Mar 2nd, 2017
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
79%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
91%
Core i7-10700F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
85%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Ryzen 7 1700X Mar 2nd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-10700F Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 2nd, 2017 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| $399.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM4 | Socket | LGA1200 |
| 95 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
