In Battlefield 6, the Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G is quite a bit faster than the FX-4300. However, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $456 more expensive!
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
- Up to 33% faster in Battlefield 6 – 81 vs 61 FPS
- Up to 33% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 7 years and 8 months newer – Jul 21, 2020 vs Oct 23, 2012
- Is 7 years and 8 months newer
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 65 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 32% less energy
FX-4300
- Up to 91% cheaper – $42.94 vs $499.00
- Up to 91% cheaper
- Up to 89% better value in Battlefield 6 – $0.70 vs $6.16/FPS
- Up to 89% better value in Battlefield 6
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G vs FX-4300: Comparison of performance and price
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
Jul 21st, 2020
Average FPS
81 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
60 FPS
100%
Price, $
$499
8%
Value, $/FPS
$6.16/FPS
11%
FX-4300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Average FPS
61 FPS
75%
Min 1% FPS
46 FPS
77%
Price, $
$42.94
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.7/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G vs FX-4300 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G vs FX-4300 in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
Jul 21st, 2020
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
FX-4300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
4 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
95%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
58%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G Jul 21st, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | FX-4300 Oct 23rd, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jul 21st, 2020 | Released | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| – | MSRP | $122.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM4 | Socket | AM3+ |
65 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 1866 MHz (DDR3) |
| Radeon Vega 7 | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
