In Battlefield 6, the Ryzen 5 4600HS is slightly slower than the Core i9-10850K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Ryzen 5 4600HS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 35 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 72% less energy
Core i9-10850K
- Up to 14% faster in Battlefield 6 – 89 vs 78 FPS
- Up to 14% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 6 months and 20 days newer – Jul 27, 2020 vs Jan 06, 2020
- Is 6 months and 20 days newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Ryzen 5 4600HS vs Core i9-10850K: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen 5 4600HS vs Core i9-10850K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen 5 4600HS vs Core i9-10850K in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen 5 4600HS
Jan 6th, 2020
Cores
6-core
60%
L3 Cache
8 MB
40%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
83%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
77%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
4266 MHz
100%
Core i9-10850K
Jul 27th, 2020
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
69%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Ryzen 5 4600HS Jan 6th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-10850K Jul 27th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 6th, 2020 | Released | Jul 27th, 2020 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| FP6 | Socket | LGA1200 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 4266 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
| Radeon RX Vega 6 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
