In Battlefield 6, the Ryzen 5 3600XT is quite a bit slower than the Core i9-14900F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Ryzen 5 3600XT
No clear advantages
Core i9-14900F
- Up to 51% faster in Battlefield 6 – 130 vs 86 FPS
- Up to 51% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 4 years and 6 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Jul 07, 2019
- Is 4 years and 6 months newer
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 65 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 32% less energy
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Ryzen 5 3600XT vs Core i9-14900F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i9-14900F
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
130 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
98 FPS
100%
Price, $
$559.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.3/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen 5 3600XT vs Core i9-14900F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen 5 3600XT vs Core i9-14900F in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen 5 3600XT
Jul 7th, 2019
Cores
6-core
25%
L3 Cache
32 MB
89%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.5 GHz
78%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
57%
Core i9-14900F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
53%
Turbo Frequency
5.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Ryzen 5 3600XT Jul 7th, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-14900F Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jul 7th, 2019 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
$249.00 | MSRP | $524.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM4 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 95 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
