The Ryzen 5 2600 is the comparison's loser – it's a slower gaming CPU than the Core i5-9400F and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's €71.02 more expensive!
Advantages of the Ryzen 5 2600
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 12 vs 6 threads
Advantages of the Core i5-9400F
- A faster CPU for gaming
- Up to 37% cheaper – €119.97 vs €190.99
- A much better value for money for gaming
Ryzen 5 2600 vs Core i5-9400F for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Ryzen 5 2600
Apr 19th, 2018
Average FPS
181
97%
Min 1% FPS
120
98%
Price, €
€190.99
62%
Value, €/FPS
€1.05/FPS
61%
Core i5-9400F
Jan 8th, 2019
Average FPS
186
100%
Min 1% FPS
123
100%
Price, €
€119.97
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.64/FPS
100%
Ryzen 5 2600 vs Core i5-9400F in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen 5 2600 vs Core i5-9400F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen 5 2600 vs Core i5-9400F in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen 5 2600
Apr 19th, 2018
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
95%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Core i5-9400F
Jan 8th, 2019
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
9 MB
56%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
85%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
91%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Ryzen 5 2600 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i5-9400F |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
$199.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
65 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
Performance | ||
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 6 |
3.4 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.9 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.1 GHz |
16 MB | L3 Cache | 9 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR4 @ 2933 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 2666 MHz |
No | Integrated Graphics | No |
Yes | Overclockable | No |