Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms Ryzen 5 2500U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 1896 days newer than Ryzen 5 2500U.
Advantages of Ryzen 5 2500U
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D - 15 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 33% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Ryzen 5 2500U - 213 vs 160 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2500U - 32 vs 8 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
213
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.66/FPS
100%
Price, €
€779.26
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €779.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Oct 26th, 2017
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 5 2500U | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Oct 26th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Raven Ridge | Codename | Raphael |
AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 120 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |