In Battlefield 6, the Ryzen 5 2500U is quite a bit slower than the Core i9-14900HX. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Ryzen 5 2500U
- Consumes up to 73% less energy – 15 vs 55 Watts
- Consumes up to 73% less energy
Core i9-14900HX
- Up to 98% faster in Battlefield 6 – 127 vs 64 FPS
- Up to 98% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 6 years and 2 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Oct 26, 2017
- Is 6 years and 2 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Ryzen 5 2500U vs Core i9-14900HX: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen 5 2500U vs Core i9-14900HX in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen 5 2500U vs Core i9-14900HX in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen 5 2500U
Oct 26th, 2017
Cores
4-core
17%
L3 Cache
4 MB
11%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
91%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
62%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
43%
Core i9-14900HX
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Ryzen 5 2500U Oct 26th, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-14900HX Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 26th, 2017 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Laptop |
| FP5 | Socket | Intel BGA 1964 |
15 W | Power Consumption | 55 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
